Should college athletes get paid for their service debate essay

Paying college athletes is difficult for a number of reasons. Firstly, according to Jeffrey Dorfman, only a few collegiate sports actually bring in money. College football, as well as men’s and women’s basketball, are the money makers as far as collegiate athletics is concerned. Most other programs are actually cash strapped. Therefore, the issue becomes should only football and basketball college athletes be paid? Is that fair to other student-athletes? Furthermore, where should the money come from? Is it the responsibility of the school to pay these athletes or the NCAA? Other questions include how much should students-athletes be paid, how often, will it work in a similar way that professional contracts work, etc?  All these questions reveal how difficult it would be to change the college athletic system to compensate college athletes.

If the student as athlete can find a way, he/she should be able to endorse products, to have paid-speaking gigs, to sell memorabilia, as Allen Sack, the author and professor at the college of business at the University of New Haven has suggested in recent years. The best college athletes in the two revenue-producing sports have always been worth much more than tuition, room, board and books. The best football and basketball players in the Big Ten have produced to the degree that a television network has become the model for every conference in America, a network worth at least tens of millions of dollars to the member institutions. Yet, no player can benefit from that work. The players have become employees of the universities and conferences as much as students -- employees with no compensation, which not only violates common decency but perhaps even the law.

The most recent (1996) drinking guidelines of the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) propose that athletes should drink "as much as tolerable" during exercise. Since some individuals can tolerate rates of free water ingestion that exceed their rates of free water loss during exercise, this advice has caused some to overdrink leading to water retention, weight gain and, in a few, death from exercise-associated hyponatraemic encephalopathy. The new drinking guidelines of the International Olympic Committee (IOC), recently re-published in this Journal, continue to argue that athletes must drink enough to replace all their weight lost during exercise and to ingest sodium chloride since sodium is "the electrolyte most critical to performance and health". In this rebuttal to that Consensus Document, I argue that these new guidelines, like their predecessors, lack an adequate, scientifically proven evidence base. Nor have they been properly evaluated in appropriately controlled, randomized, prospective clinical trials. In particular, these new guidelines provide erroneous recommendations on five topics. If novel universal guidelines for fluid ingestion during exercise are to be promulgated by important international bodies including the IOC, they should first be properly evaluated in appropriately controlled, randomized, prospective clinical trials conducted under environmental and other conditions that match those found in "out-of-doors" exercise. This, and the potential influence of commercial interests on scientific independence and objectivity, are the two most important lessons to be learned from the premature adoption of those 1996 ACSM drinking guidelines that are not evidence-based. These concerns need to be addressed before the novel IOC guidelines are accepted uncritically. Otherwise the predictable consequences of the premature adoption of the 1996 ACSM guidelines will be repeated.

I think college football players should get paid because they practice a lot to be a good player’s , also because they are helping the coach to get a lot of money and they’re the ones doing all the work . If they’re good players i think they should be amateurs players & get paid . I don’t think it’ll ruin their college athletics because they are wasting their time just to help the coach get money while they get nothing . It would be unfair if only the college football team got paid because just cause they’re girls don’t mean they don’t waste their time playing & training .

Should college athletes get paid for their service debate essay

should college athletes get paid for their service debate essay

I think college football players should get paid because they practice a lot to be a good player’s , also because they are helping the coach to get a lot of money and they’re the ones doing all the work . If they’re good players i think they should be amateurs players & get paid . I don’t think it’ll ruin their college athletics because they are wasting their time just to help the coach get money while they get nothing . It would be unfair if only the college football team got paid because just cause they’re girls don’t mean they don’t waste their time playing & training .

Media:

should college athletes get paid for their service debate essayshould college athletes get paid for their service debate essayshould college athletes get paid for their service debate essayshould college athletes get paid for their service debate essay